English
Home
Knowledge
Intellectual property rights
Trademark Registration
Trademark Basics
U.S. Trademark Registration Essentials III: How to Choose the "Four Bases" for U.S. Trademark Applications?
|
Use in Commerce – Section 1(a) |
||
|
Definition |
At the time the application is submitted, the goods or services covered by the trademark are already publicly sold or provided in the U.S. market. |
|
|
Application Scenario |
Suitable for sellers whose products are already stocked in U.S. physical retail stores or reliably purchased by U.S.-based consumers via online stores, or applicants who can steadily provide services within the U.S. |
|
|
Pros |
Fastest Process |
Submitting specimens and the date of first use in the U.S. along with the application allows the applicant to obtain the registration certificate immediately after passing examination and publication. |
|
Lowest Cost |
The cheapest option because there is no need to subsequently file a Statement of Use or go through extra administrative steps. |
|
|
Cons |
High Upfront Risk |
You must introduce the market to the U.S. beforehand. If the trademark ultimately fails to register due to a likelihood of confusion with a prior mark, the upfront investment cannot be recovered. If you need to change the brand, products already printed with the original mark cannot be undone. |
|
Risk of Being Pirated/Squatted |
Precisely because it was "used first," publicizing it in the U.S. without filing promptly could result in the trademark being pre-emptively registered by someone else. |
|
|
Intent to Use – Section 1(b) |
||
|
Definition |
At the time of filing, the goods or services are not yet publicly sold or provided in the U.S. market, but the applicant has a bona fide intent to sell or provide them in the U.S. market in the future. |
|
|
Application Scenario |
Suitable for applicants who want to secure a trademark name to prevent others from registering it, ensure the mark passes examination and publication before investing in production and use, or whose products are still in the R&D/stocking phase and expected to launch in the U.S. in a few months. |
|
|
Pros |
Queue First, Prevent Squatting |
Secures a priority filing position to prevent others from beating you to it. |
|
Lower Investment Risk |
No need to use the mark in the U.S. upfront; you can ensure the mark is "capable of registration" before committing more resources to production and market launch. |
|
|
Cons |
Slower Process |
Requires submitting a Statement of Use and specimens within 6 months of receiving the Notice of Allowance after publication (extensions can be requested up to 5 times for 6 months each, but each extension incurs an extra fee). Failing to provide specimens by the deadline means the registration certificate cannot be obtained. |
|
Increased Cost |
Subsequent filing of a Statement of Use is mandatory, incurring extra fees. |
|
|
Foreign Registration – Section 44(e) |
||
|
Definition |
The trademark is already successfully registered in your home country (e.g., Hong Kong or Mainland China). |
|
|
Application Scenario |
Suitable for applicants who have operated and owned a registered trademark in their home country for years and wish to expand into the U.S. market without having actual commercial sales locally in the U.S. yet. |
|
|
Pros |
Exemption from U.S. Specimens |
No need to submit U.S. domestic use specimens at the time of filing or after publication, bypassing the preliminary use examination. |
|
Simple Process and Lower Cost |
Registration certificates can be obtained right after examination and publication conclude, making it as cost-effective as the actual use basis. |
|
|
Cons |
Restricted Scope |
The U.S. application scope cannot exceed the scope approved in the home country registration certificate. |
|
Rigorous Official Examination |
The U.S. review of the identification of goods/services is extremely strict. There is a high chance of receiving an Office Action requiring amendments to the description, which delays the process and incurs extra professional service fees for each response. |
|
|
Foreign Registration – Section 44(e) |
||
|
Definition |
The trademark has already been filed in your home country, and a U.S. application is submitted within 6 months by claiming priority. |
|
|
Application Scenario |
Suitable for applicants looking to launch and deploy new brands globally in sync. |
|
|
Pros |
Priority Protection |
Claiming priority within 6 months of filing in the home country effectively prevents competitors from squatting on the mark in the U.S. during this window. |
|
Temporary Relief from U.S. Use Pressure |
No need for actual U.S. use right away, reducing losses if the trademark fails to register. |
|
|
Cons |
Restricted Scope |
The U.S. application scope cannot exceed the scope approved in the home country registration certificate. |
|
Rigorous Official Examination |
The U.S. review of the identification of goods/services is extremely strict. There is a high chance of receiving an Office Action requiring amendments to the description, which delays the process and incurs extra professional service fees for each response. |
|
|
Subsequent Transition Required |
Most importantly, Section 44(d) serves merely as a "stepping stone" to claim priority. You must eventually pair it with Section 1(a) (filing a Statement of Use and specimens) or Section 44(e) (submitting the home country registration certificate) to formally complete registration. |
|
|
Disclaimer All information in this article is only for the purpose of information sharing, instead of professional suggestion. Kaizen will not assume any responsibility for loss or damage. |