English
Home
Knowledge
Intellectual property rights
Trademark Registration
Trademark Basics
International vs. National Trademark Filing Guide (XI): Long-term Brand Strategy
|
(1) |
Startup and Testing Phase: When resources are limited and markets are uncertain, focusing on National Applications in core markets is recommended. This ensures the most robust protection in critical battlegrounds while avoiding the risk of a "Central Attack" collapsing the entire portfolio. |
|
(2) |
Rapid Expansion Phase: Once the brand is established at home and ready for broad entry into regions like Europe or Southeast Asia, the Madrid System becomes the ultimate tool. It allows companies to cast a wide "Defensive Net" quickly to deter trademark squatters. |
|
(1) |
Core Marks (Main Brand): For your most vital brand assets, National Applications in key jurisdictions (U.S., China, Japan, EU) are advised. This "premium" approach ensures that rights are independent of any home-country setbacks and are defined by precise local specifications.
|
|
(2) |
Sub-brands and Defensive Marks: For secondary lines or marks filed primarily to block competitors, the Madrid System is ideal for reducing administrative overhead and achieving cost-effective mass management. |
|
(1) |
Subsequent Designation: As new countries join (e.g., recent ASEAN members), companies can extend existing international registrations to these new markets without refiling everything.
|
|
(2) |
National Backups: Budget should always be reserved for national filings in non-member states (e.g., Taiwan, Saudi Arabia) or markets with highly idiosyncratic examination practices. |
|
Disclaimer All information in this article is only for the purpose of information sharing, instead of professional suggestion. Kaizen will not assume any responsibility for loss or damage. |