English
Home
Knowledge
China
China Taxes
Corporate Taxes
China's EIT Issues on Indirect Offshore Disposal of Assets
|
(1) |
Whether the main value of the equity of overseas enterprises is directly or indirectly derived from taxable assets in China; |
|
(2) |
Whether the assets of overseas enterprises are mainly composed of direct or indirect investments within the territory of China, or whether the income they obtain mainly comes directly or indirectly from within China; |
|
(3) |
Whether the actual functions performed and risks borne by overseas enterprises and their subsidiaries directly or indirectly holding taxable assets in China can prove that the enterprise structure has economic substance; |
|
(4) |
The duration of existence of overseas enterprise shareholders, business models and related organizational structures; |
|
(5) |
The situation of income tax payable on the indirect transfer of Chinese taxable property transactions abroad; |
|
(6) |
The substitutability of indirect investment and indirect transfer of taxable property in China by the equity transferor compared with direct investment and direct transfer of taxable property in China; |
|
(7) |
The applicable tax treaties or arrangements in China for income from the indirect transfer of taxable property in China; |
|
(8) |
Other relevant factors. |
|
(1) |
Determine whether the main subject matter of the indirect transfer transaction is taxable property in China by the source of the equity value of the transferred overseas enterprise and the composition of the assets and income of the overseas enterprise. |
|
(2) |
Through functional risk analysis, determine the economic substance of the transferred overseas enterprise and its other overseas middle-level subsidiaries. Usually, starting from the equity setting of the relevant enterprises as well as their business conditions and financial information such as personnel, property and income, the correlation between the equity of the transferred enterprise and the actual functions performed and risks borne by the relevant enterprises, as well as its substantive economic significance in the enterprise group structure, is analyzed. |
|
(3) |
Consider the planning traces of indirect transfer transactions and related arrangements through time intervals. |
|
(4) |
Determine whether there are cross-border tax benefits based on the tax payable abroad. The situation of income tax payable abroad includes the tax payable by the equity transferor in its home country and the tax payable in the location of the transferee. The tax payable situation should not only take into account the actual taxes paid for indirect transfer transactions abroad, but also consider the application of overseas tax laws that affect the tax base of overseas income tax, such as overseas profit and loss offsetting and loss carry-forward. If the overall income tax payable in the resident country of the equity transferor and the location of the transferee is lower than the amount of tax payable in China for the indirect transfer transaction, it can be proved that there is a cross-border tax benefit in the indirect transfer of taxable property in China. |
|
(5) |
Determine whether there is reasonable commercial substance in indirect transactions through the analysis of substitutability between direct investment and direct transfer of taxable property in China and indirect investment and indirect transfer of taxable property in China. Substitutability analysis will take into account a variety of commercial and non-commercial factors such as market access, transaction review, transaction compliance and transaction objectives, and will not be determined based on a single factor (such as market access restrictions). |
|
Disclaimer All information in this article is only for the purpose of information sharing, instead of professional suggestion. Kaizen will not assume any responsibility for loss or damage. |